Featured

A New Year’s Resolution for 2024: Give of Yourself for American Unity

Here’s a resolution for a year that promises to be as divisive and angry as any in America’s recent history: give blood.

With the elections still 11 months away, candidates already are emphasizing our differences, explicitly or implicitly appealing to voters along socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, religious, or other lines, often by magnifying real grievances or validating questionable ones.

Giving blood is the polar opposite. It is meaningful action taken for selfless purposes rather than empty words uttered for selfish reasons.

Most importantly, when you give blood, you don’t know who your donation will end up helping — a Black woman or a white man, someone who is straight or gay, liberal or conservative, rich or poor, a Muslim, Jew, Christian, or atheist. What you do know is that you are helping someone in dire need. And that’s a powerful reminder that while we may have important differences, the challenges that any one of us can face – a devastating accident, the need for a major operation, cancer – are far more important.

Over the course of almost 250 years, millions of Americans have shed their blood to secure the country’s independence, preserve its unity, or protect its people, land, and way of life from foreign foes. While giving blood in no way compares to the sacrifices those people made, it is a way for us to embrace their spirit of service, to literally give of ourselves for the benefit of other Americans.

In short, to donate blood is to contribute to the cause of American unity. It is, in this sense, an act of patriotism, and a rebuke to those who would divide us for their own ends.

*****

To learn more about donating blood, or to schedule an appointment, contact your local Blood Center or hospital, or visit the American Red Cross website at https://www.redcrossblood.org/.

Featured

3 New Year’s Resolutions for a Healthier, Happier America

A trio of New Year’s resolutions that millions of people pursue to improve their personal lives also can go far toward enhancing our country’s political life and societal dynamics. Consider:

  1. Losing weight. Let’s resolve to shed the heavy burden of the disdain we too often feel for others with opposing views, the self-righteousness with which we present our own beliefs, and the cynicism that can make us lose faith in the value of consensus and compromise, patience and proportionality.

    Action step: The next time you hear someone advance an idea with which you strongly disagree, do your best to just listen without verbally or mentally responding, dismissing, or deriding. After that, think about what they had to say, and about why they may hold that position. You’re not likely to suddenly embrace their thinking, but you may come away with a better appreciation of why they feel the way they do – and of how you might engage with them more effectively.

  2. Following a better diet: Let’s resolve to stop consuming the “fast food” of snarky social media posts, sound bites, and slogans in favor of following a fact-based diet that, like a good home-made meal, requires more time and work but is far more nutritious and satisfying.

    Action step: Select an issue you care about deeply and read a substantive, fact-filled article on the topic written by an academic researcher or other disinterested party. Your effort may be rewarded with a trove of new statistics that can be used to champion your cause more convincingly – or it may reveal nuances that argue against a hard-and-fast approach. Either way, your opinions and our political discourse will be the better for it.

  3. Enhancing our relationships with others. Let’s resolve to remember that — whether you voted for Joe Biden or Donald Trump – more than 70 million people voted for the other candidate. Those opposing ranks include relatives, friends, neighbors, and co-workers. How are you going to get over your political differences with them? You’re probably not, and the more you try, the more likely you are to end up in an argument.

    Action step: Reach out to someone important to you who has political views very different than your own, and talk with that person about anything except politics. Too often, we neglect strengthening the ties that bind in favor of widening the gaps that separate us.

Driving significant, sustained change is very difficult, whether in our personal lives or in the political life of our nation. In both cases, however, the benefits are well worth the effort. Happy new year!

Featured

Beyond Candidates and Causes, We Need Better Americans

 

 “The fault, dear Brutus, is not is our stars, but in ourselves.”

Cassius Julius Casear (I,ii.140-141)

We will elect a President one year from today.

While the electorate is divided on many issues, there is agreement across the political spectrum that this campaign will be as contentious and downright nasty as any in recent history.

The impeachment process will be a prime source of discord. There also is no shortage of pollster-tested hot button issues that candidates will champion to “energize the base.” We can look forward to mean-spirited debates, odious social media messaging, and television ads that portray the sponsors’ opponents in ridiculously sinister terms.

Politicians and advocacy groups bear much of the blame for this sorry state of affairs. But an even larger share rests with us, the voters. Politicians pursue the approaches that will get them elected, and we’ve shown them time and again that fostering division and dissatisfaction is a winning strategy.

So long as we cheer unyielding stances and disdain compromise, respond to sloganeering and ignore reasoned argument, and prefer self-righteous self interest to disinterested concern for the common good, the politicians we reward with office will reward us with more of the same.

Candidates matter. Causes matter even more. Advocating for the people and positions we support is the essence of democracy. But we are operating today in a carnival-mirror environment in which campaigns and special interest groups have distorted the appearance of each election and issue to swell its stature and invest it with outsized significance.

Hyperbole is not new to American politics. But the ability to deliver an unrelenting stream of emotionally laden messages to highly targeted voters through social media, television, phone calls, and other means is – and our track record in withstanding that onslaught and sifting fact from fiction has not been reassuring.

A marriage won’t last if one spouse decides that any single issue – where the couple will live, how the children will be raised, what spending priorities will prevail – is more important than the marriage itself.

The country is no different. Unless we remember that no candidate or cause is more important than the underlying strengths of the country itself – including respect for the rule of law and civil discourse – we will continue to fray the fibers of our polity until we reach a point of dangerous disrepair (if we’re not there already).

At the highest, most-visible level, the well-being of the country depends on the officials we elect and policies we adopt. Beneath that, there are important questions about how we choose officials and implement policies. This encompasses debate on issues such as term limits, the Electoral College, voter-registration rules, and campaign finance. At the bottom – or foundation, if you prefer – are the people themselves.

The premise of this blog is that if we want better elected officials and better policies, we need to be better Americans. Somewhat paradoxically, that means caring less about a particular candidate or cause in favor of caring more about how we conduct ourselves when deciding who we elect and what we do.

Over the next 12 months, we can continue to stretch and shred the ties that bind by embracing adulation of candidates, intransigent positions, intemperate rhetoric, and arrogant disregard for opposing views. Or we can take a deep breath, a long view, and a mature approach to protecting the country from our own worst instincts. In short, we can seek a better America by being better Americans.

Which Side Are You On? The Choice Every American Has to Make

The attack on the Capitol last Wednesday showed us the dividing line that matters more than any other for our country.

The differences between conservatives and progressives, Republicans and Democrats, are real and important. Enduring racial disparities present profound challenges, as does the widening gap between our wealthiest and poorest citizens. Various regions of the country, economic sectors, and demographic groups have conflicting interests that drive them to compete for advantage.

All of those differences and distinctions are significant and complex, but none is beyond the ability of our system of laws and our democratic processes to address, albeit in an often-imperfect manner and at a pace that can be excruciatingly slow.

The demarcation that truly counts is the one that separates the great majority of Americans who are committed to working within that system of laws and through those democratic processes from those at either extreme of the political spectrum who are willing to use violence, destruction, and intimidation to pursue their ends.

The 9/11 terrorist attacks gave us a renewed – if fleeting – appreciation of the fact that what unites us as Americans is much greater than that which divides us. Will we be able to draw – and sustain – the same realization from an attack conducted not by Al Qaeda hijackers but by those from within our own midst who would hijack the electoral process?

If so, we need to begin with an unequivocal, universal rejection of the use of violence as a tool of domestic politics. That sounds so obvious as to not merit mention. But for such a stand to be meaningful, it must go beyond a pro forma condemnation of a particular violent episode or group of people to be truly unequivocal and universally applicable.

That means no rationalizations that give a scintilla of legitimacy to those who threaten or actually engage in violence. After the mob stormed the Capitol last week, many conservatives roundly denounced the lawlessness without caveat or qualification. A few, however, followed their disavowals with words about the importance of recognizing the pent-up frustration that had led to the assault. When some of the racial justice protests this summer provided an excuse for a small subset of participants and hangers-on to engage in arson, looting, and attacks on people, there were some among the much larger ranks of peaceful activists who termed that violence the regrettable but inevitable consequence of people being denied justice and opportunity. What an insult, in both instances, to the overwhelming majority of people who feel frustrated with the political process, or who long have struggled with the burdens of injustice, but who have opted for engagement and activism within the bounds of the law.

It also means no “whatabout-ism” – the temptation to follow criticism of people on one’s own side of the political divide with protestations that similarly unacceptable behavior by those in the opposing camp hasn’t received comparable media attention or public censure. “Yes, what a few extremists who don’t represent the mainstream of our movement did was absolutely wrong, but a few months back when the other side did essentially the same thing, where was the outrage then?” Anyone in a marriage or other committed relationship knows that responding to a reproof by dredging up an instance where your significant other did much the same leads to rounds of recrimination, not rapid reconciliation.

This is not to suggest that all acts of violence are morally equivalent. People who loot a business are committing an inexcusable act that should be fully prosecuted, but that just doesn’t compare with breaking through windows in the Capitol to try to prevent our elected officials from carrying out a Constitutional duty that is part of the electoral process. However, one of the many benefits of condemning all acts of political or politically related violence is that we don’t have to spend time calibrating our criticism or engaging in fruitless debates about what constitutes the greater wrong.

Our country is in greater need of unity than at any time I can remember. Paradoxically, the first step in that direction requires an act of separation – of casting out of the body politic those who would administer violent remedies for its ills. Conservatives need to take the lead in showing right-wing extremists the door, while progressives have a parallel obligation to close the door on leftist zealots. By putting distance between themselves and those of like mind who would employ intimidation and cause injury, conservatives and progressives reduce the distance between one another.

The horrifying scene at the Capitol provides vivid proof that each American has to choose a side – not between right and left, but between embracing the view that the ends justify the means or deciding that the rule of law and the democratic process must prevail, even when they don’t yield the results we may have wanted.

Consider This ‘Rapinoe Resolution’ for 2020

Megan Rapinoe
Looking for a New Year’s resolution that goes beyond losing weight (again) or reducing your credit card debt?

Here’s one that will be good for you and the whole country. Megan Rapinoe, co-captain of the U.S. women’s national soccer team, presented it as her “charge to everyone” when speaking in July at a New York City ticker-tape parade celebrating the team’s 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup victory:

“We have to be better. We have to love more. Hate less. [We’ve] got to listen more and talk less.”

Ms. Rapinoe is neither apolitical nor timid. She cares passionately about many issues, and has spoken out on them forcefully, earning her both praise and wrath.

That fervor notwithstanding, her “charge to everyone” reflects a recognition that we don’t win our point by losing our respect for the humanity and dignity of those with opposing views.

The new year will open with all manner of unfinished, unpleasant business carried over from the old, starting with the impeachment proceedings. We also can look forward to 10+ months of a presidential campaign that promises to be as nasty as any in our lifetimes.

If you want to counter the vitriol by accepting Ms. Rapinoe’s “charge to everyone” as your own for 2020, start by seeking out a friend, neighbor, or acquaintance whose political views are very different from yours. Ask if they would explain not just their position on an issue about which you disagree but, more importantly, why they feel that way.

Don’t try to refute them, dispute them, rule them, school them, correct them, convert them, or anything else them. Don’t ask for equal time. Just listen as closely and non-judgmentally as possible, asking a clarifying (and non-loaded) question or two if needed, and thank them for sharing their thinking. Then let what they had to say ramble around in your head for a day or two. You’re unlikely to suddenly agree with them, which is fine. You may find merit in some component of their argument, or you may come away more convinced than ever that you’re in the right.

None of that is the point, however. By asking them to share their views, you show that you value them and their thinking. You invite them to go beyond sloganeering. And you gain a greater understanding of how their experiences, hopes, fears, and mindset shape their views. That focus  on the human dimension can provide the basis for empathy, and for less-angry and more-substantive dialogue.  It can make us better people and better Americans. In the process, it can make for a truly happier new year and a better America.

Note: Photograph by Jamie Smed from Cincinnati, OH, courtesy of WikiMedia Commons.
Jamie Smed from Cincinnati, Ohio [CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)%5D

Introduce Yourself (Example Post)

This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.

You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.

Why do this?

  • Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
  • Because it will help you focus you own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.

The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.

To help you get started, here are a few questions:

  • Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
  • What topics do you think you’ll write about?
  • Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
  • If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?

You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.

Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.

When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.